Marxist and Functionalist Theories on Crime and Deviance : Comparisons and ContrastsThere are several(prenominal) theories that would posting for criminal offense and deviance They emphasize particular aspects and underpinnings of abhorrence and deviance as social phenomena . The Marxist and functionalist theories are totally two of them . This brief treatise shall concern itself with the major points and arguments of the two contending philosophic and sociological standpoints , highlighting their parallels and differencesAccording to the functionalist school of thought , deviance delineates the parameters of whizz s morality . The community provides for rules and br laws to govern social transaction and affairs and the people are expected to observe and sanction by the same .
Deviance is not an intrinsic human being de chambre manner , but rather a social reach and the focus of functionalism is not so much on the stimulation that prompted one s deviation , but on how the resulting actions were perceived by some as normal , while others look at them as downright deviant (Lauderdale , 1976 ,. 660 Adherents of this theory believes that strict enforcement of brisk laws , imposition of disciplinary measures and social naming and labeling shag sum up about good conduct from members of the society . Under a functionalist set-up , deviant members of the society receive the full force of joint outrage or conscience collective . Good behavior is ascertained based on one ! s conformity with the paramount moral and legal codes of conduct . However , deviance chamberpot also contribute to social change as they came to fence the status quo , proposing alternative or amendments...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper