Philosophy :: essays research papers

PhilosophyMans life is a line that nature commands him to cite upon the out-of-doors of the Earth without ever being able to swerve from it, even for an instantHis organization does in nowise depend upon himself, his topics come to him involuntarily, his habits are in the government agency of those who cause him to contract themHe is good or bad, happy or miserable, wise or foolish, reasonable or irrational, without his will being for eitherthing in these diverse states. -DHolbachI believe DHolbach is trying to convey essentially that man is deprived of freehanded will. Mankind in no way possesses any run into of their actions, being, personality, or will. Every aspect of a persons life is predetermined. He says people have only adopted the views of religion and couch their credit in supreme beings such as God. Nietzsche, on the other hand, views human nature in a different perspective. He believes man originated the idea of free will solely for the purpose of business t o give men authority in crime and punishment. He also writes of the injustice in third estate misinterpretations of causation. Nietzsche focuses principally on the relationship between cause and effect and free will whereas DHolbach speaks more assertively about mans preordination and ignores any opposition one might have towards his point of view. Nietzsche also believes a person can non be held accountable for their existence or living purlieu (also accountability is a major part of his idea). He states No one gives a human being his qualities not God, not society, not his parents or ancestors, and not himself. On the contrary, DHolbach believes some superior being is responsible for having a master plan for each human and giving them their characteristics, hence we are cogs in the universe. I interpret the ideas of these two philosophers to be closely related.Philosophy essays research papers PhilosophyMans life is a line that nature commands him to describe upon the surfa ce of the Earth without ever being able to swerve from it, even for an instantHis organization does in nowise depend upon himself, his ideas come to him involuntarily, his habits are in the power of those who cause him to contract themHe is good or bad, happy or miserable, wise or foolish, reasonable or irrational, without his will being for anything in these various states. -DHolbachI believe DHolbach is trying to convey essentially that man is deprived of free will. Mankind in no way possesses any control of their actions, being, personality, or will. Every aspect of a persons life is predetermined. He says people have only adopted the views of religion and put their faith in supreme beings such as God. Nietzsche, on the other hand, views human nature in a different perspective. He believes man originated the idea of free will solely for the purpose of accountability to give men authority in crime and punishment. He also writes of the injustice in common misinterpretations of caus ation. Nietzsche focuses mainly on the relationship between cause and effect and free will whereas DHolbach speaks more assertively about mans predetermination and ignores any opposition one might have towards his point of view. Nietzsche also believes a person cannot be held accountable for their existence or living environment (also accountability is a major part of his idea). He states No one gives a human being his qualities not God, not society, not his parents or ancestors, and not himself. On the contrary, DHolbach believes some superior being is responsible for having a master plan for each human and giving them their characteristics, hence we are cogs in the universe. I interpret the ideas of these two philosophers to be closely related.